Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nieman Foundation for Journalism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was: keep. sjorford →•← 14:41, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Nieman Foundation for Journalism
This was on Speedy Delete, most likely because it had a misspelled title, it used to read Nieman Foundation for Jounrnalism. However, after reviewing the page, it seems notable enough and well-written enough to keep, so I moved it to this current title, with Journalism spelled correctly. I think it should be kept, Google returns 6,710 hits when in quotations and it seems highly notable, but I decided to put it through VfD since it WAS on Speedy Delete CunningLinguist 03:33, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Almafeta 04:06, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Never should have been on Speedy Delete for a misspelling. It's easy to move articles. Keep --Barfooz (talk) 04:48, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep I'm the original misspeller. I explain there why I made the page as part of the Howard Simons bio, after writing him up to fill a missing link on W. Mark Felt. Once this is saved from oblivion, it should be merged with The Nieman Foundation for Journalism, which I made by accident as well. Merging is beyond my meager skills. Jokestress 04:53, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: Actually, the articles are identical if I'm not mistaken, correct? Therefore there is no need to merge, one article should be deleted. Since there is no need for the 'The' article in front of the name, people should vote keep on this article and ill nominate the other article for deletion. -CunningLinguist 05:39, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- That's right, I made the changes later to Nieman Fellowship, not this article, and then I was going to link the parentheticals in the Curator list. Then I decided I better leave it alone till it all got fixed. Jokestress 06:06, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: Actually, the articles are identical if I'm not mistaken, correct? Therefore there is no need to merge, one article should be deleted. Since there is no need for the 'The' article in front of the name, people should vote keep on this article and ill nominate the other article for deletion. -CunningLinguist 05:39, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep this and perhaps the other title could be a redirect. Capitalistroadster 06:00, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, and redirect the other title. -- BD2412 talk 07:57, 2005 Jun 2 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.