Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Sandler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The references appear trivial for the most part. She was present when the station was converted from over-the-air to online but she is not portrayed as the instigator or planner of that transition. WP:BIO is fairly strict about the requirements for someone in the entertainment business to have an article. EdJohnston (talk) 02:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nicole Sandler

Nicole Sandler (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Fails WP:BIO. Lacks 3rd party references to significant coverage of this local radio personality. No mention of notable awards or widespread recognition for industry contributions. Appears to be just another local DJ, PD, etc. Rtphokie (talk) 00:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Strong Keep I don't know how to respond to other people in here but I think this should be kept. A news reporter of 10TV aka WBNS of Columbus, Ohio doesn't have.. any notable awards and widespread recognition, but she is notable by those who watch the news. Some would want to look her up for more information about her. Same with Nicole Sandler. She's not all that famous. Those who listen to her on the radio where she is DJing will know her. Those who are curious and want information would want to go to Wikipedia for information just like many other people do for information and they won't get jack squat. So I request Keep.--Xxhopingtearsxx (talk) 01:13, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

• Keep: Notable for being in charge of converting first radio station from on air to online operation. Citations in New York Times, Wired Magazine. This shows cites in other national newspapers (outside the areas where she worked in), which asserts notability. Calwatch (talk) 01:56, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
• Weak keep - Per Calwatch and Xxhopingtearsxx. asenine ^{say what?} 06:29, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
• Comment - Being well known in her local area makes her notable in that area, working for several newspapers nationwide doesn't really help either. However, coverage in a national magazine and nationally distributed newspaper does amount to significant 3rd party coverage and does speak to notoriety in her field. Those references need to be added and the article reworked a bit to make it clear why she is notable. As it stands, it still paints her as a morning radio DJ which, base on the above, sells her short.--Rtphokie (talk) 11:46, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:27, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep, seems notable enough. Stifle (talk) 20:07, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, Non notable. This article is only a collection of some very weak references collected from around the web - (one ref on her having adopted a child. One ref on her running her own buisness. One ref that only mentions her name in comments on a news story by "anonymous" and "greg". One ref mentioning she is "is recovering from double pneumonia in Miami"). Though a few references mention that she does indeed work in the radio business. Anyways, there is no evidence that this person is notable compared to the countless others who work in her field.--Celtus (talk) 06:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, Non notable. All references are trivial, no significant coverage of the article subject. --Jklamo (talk) 17:34, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.