Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Peters
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.--Kubigula (talk) 04:04, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Nicole Peters
Again, I don't think this girl's notable. Fails WP:PORNBIO. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 13:50, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil 22:43, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I think her Newcomer of the Year and Model of the Year awards are enough to pass criteria 1 and 3. Epbr123 22:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- comment - I'm so embarassed making these comments on several of these types of actresses hence the new user name. I am embarassed to admit that I have watched some of these videos. This is a model, not an actress so I can't make any comment under WP:PORNBIO because I don't know about models.Blushing 19:16, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Don't be embarrassed. The internets are for porn. No exceptions!--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 23:10, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Wknight94 (talk) 11:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per the bio standard. More proncruft. Eusebeus 18:58, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep As per WP:PORNBIO: "Performer has won or been a serious nominee for a well-known award." Looks okay by me. The article could use a touchup, though. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 20:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. She's notable within the big-bust genre, and has won a few awards, thus passing WP:PORNBIO. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 18:54, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
