The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was copyvio!!!Grandmasterka 05:25, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete Unencyclopedic to the nth degree. Fails WP:BIO, is only notable (if you can call it that) by association. Chabuk 04:25, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Comes close to being speedyable. Valrith 04:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment Current version is from [1] directly, except some pronouns have been changed. If kept, it would need to be a rewritten version, because this one is a copyvio. --W.marsh 05:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.