Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicola Clarke

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete A7.  RasputinAXP  c 02:57, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nicola Clarke

Fails WP:BIO, but too funny to just speedy out of existance --DarkAudit 23:10, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Delete Hoax article. But amusing. Yanksox (talk) 23:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Userfy if the article creator is willing to fess up to being the subject, maybe worthy of BJAODN otherwise? --Bugwit grunt / scribbles 23:49, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Userfy or Delete Very funny Hoax--Nick Y. 00:26, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment I'd love to know what userfy means. I think I get the delete part. Am I going to be arrested? I'm not ready for jail. Not yet. 23:49, 26 June 1902
  • Comment It'd move to User:yournamehere (not using your real username). It's the page you get when you click on your name at the top of the page. --DarkAudit 00:46, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak, Timid, Grovelling Delete. Afraid to say delete because of all those nuclear weapons (despite the crystal ball gazing!). Will she seek retribution against those of us who speak out? Time will only tell! Agent 86 00:57, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I say userfy! then. This isn't meant to be funny to an outsider, I see no reason how it could be. just was an inside joke, directed at a friend. who the article is about. I thought I'd give her 5 minutes of fame. :) My clock is broke. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Creativetrust (talk • contribs) 01:23, 27 June 2006 (UTC).
You'd better hurry up with it then. I tagged it for a speedy deletion. ikh (talk) 01:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete, per A7, and so boldly tagged. Made me laught a bit, but still doesn't deserve existance. ikh (talk) 01:15, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.