Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicol paone
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was deleted as copyvio. JeremyA (talk) 17:23, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Nicol paone
NN, D. ComCat 00:44, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
- Actually it's a copyvio - [1]. FreplySpang (talk) 00:44, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep based solely on the lack of justification given for its listing here. Use words, please. Bryan 06:22, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
- We can't legally retain a copyvio for any reason. If you want the article to survive, you can write a non-copyvio on the article's /Temp subpage, otherwise, irrespective of the outcome of this debate, it will be removed. -Splash 16:53, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
- It is, however, perfectly valid to vote keep on an article nominated on AfD and subsequently discovered to be a copyvio. AfD is used to determine whether the topic and not the content is valid. The current version is going to be deleted as a copyvio regardless of what the result of this AfD is, but the AfD result may be valid if a new version of the article is created. JYolkowski // talk 22:59, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, that's what I wanted to say, only I didn't. In the absence of a new version, though, even an overwhelming 'keep' AfD wouldn't have effect. -Splash 23:24, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
- What JYolkowski said. Wikipedia:Copyright_problems is an entirely separate process from VfD. Bryan 05:53, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- It is, however, perfectly valid to vote keep on an article nominated on AfD and subsequently discovered to be a copyvio. AfD is used to determine whether the topic and not the content is valid. The current version is going to be deleted as a copyvio regardless of what the result of this AfD is, but the AfD result may be valid if a new version of the article is created. JYolkowski // talk 22:59, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
- We can't legally retain a copyvio for any reason. If you want the article to survive, you can write a non-copyvio on the article's /Temp subpage, otherwise, irrespective of the outcome of this debate, it will be removed. -Splash 16:53, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
- Cypy-and-pasted fragment of text from a website. Delete as copyvio. - Mike Rosoft 15:43, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, nn. Sdedeo 21:26, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
