Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicky Lee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mailer Diablo 15:47, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nicky Lee

I admit that I am not well-versed in the manhua genre, but it still appears to me that the article asserts insufficient notability. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 09:22, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:Bio. Most of the Ghits were to unrelated people. Dionyseus 09:28, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep. WP:BIO includes "published authors who have received multiple indepentent reviews for their work", and as far as I can tell this author passes. If not, the articles on her work possibly deserve deletion also. JPD (talk) 11:08, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per JPD. Appears notable. Powers 13:48, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Week keep. Appears notable, but barely. - Che Nuevara: ^{Join the Revolution} 15:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Week Keep, appears notable, barely. --PresN 19:18, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. A Chinese google search turns up a few leads. Given she publishes to a Chinese audience, English Ghits aren't going to be useful. --ColourBurst 22:41, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• keep please she is notable enough for bio guideline Yuckfoo 01:33, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Added material (there's a bio now for yuckfoo). And large fanbase (english and chinese) available though not easily found, especially if using google. strideranne 04:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.