Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick vs. Andy

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 04:44, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nick vs. Andy

Promo for a non-notable website. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 21:49, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) WITHDRAWN

• Delete: or speedy delete. The redirect is being speedied. Non-notable, .com vanity.
• Delete, I concur. Onlyemarie 21:51, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• DON'T DELETE!!!: Who are we to decide what's notable and what isn't?
  • Wikipedia users in good standing? Delete. A Man In Black 12:47, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: The fact that a majority of the forum members aparently know eithier "Nick" or "Andy" is proof of how non notable this actually is.Deathawk 02:25, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, promo. Megan1967 06:03, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. nn. website. jni 08:24, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I decide that it's not notable. Nestea 01:12, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:38, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, even though it has a medium google hit rate (some 900), I don't consider it worthy of the Wikipedia (we can't put the entire internet in Wikipedia!). --Marianocecowski 11:38, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.