Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Sterling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus; main complaint was verifiability, but Quarl indicated article is easily verifiable. Johnleemk | Talk 11:39, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nick Sterling

Unverifiable vanity article. Asserts notability so avoids a speedy deletion. Stifle 23:20, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

• delete per nom  J\/\/estbrook   Talk  VSCA    23:24, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 02:25, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Verifiable via Google, AMG. Might be notable; unsure. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-13 12:08Z
• Keep. Needs references. Give them a chance to add refernces. Seems more notable than the average teenage band that shows up here. Crunch 14:28, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.