Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Piercey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus, defaults to Keep. NawlinWiki 18:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nick Piercey

Nick Piercey (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Just a local radio presenter. Article doesn't show how he's notable. No references/links. Reads like a CV. Aillema 01:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fuhghettaboutit 03:52, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. No secondary coverage given; hence fails WP:BIO. --B. Wolterding 16:23, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Appears notable due to various involvements with BBC. -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 20:52, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment And I worked for PBS for two years does that make me notable? No. Whispering 16:36, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete No reliable sources indicating notability. Fails WP:BIO. Whispering 16:36, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. I have a feeling this DJ may pass WP:BIO, given his appearances on a number of major local radio stations. And after all (as they say), if you promote a person enough, eventually they become famous. I think this guy might be just about. Sources would help though. DWaterson 23:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - just. Google news archive turns up some sources [1], [2], [3], [4]. Helping the Children's hospital, sponsored by Elton John to run the London Marathon etc. I'd say there's enough non trivial mentions for WP:BIO - but he's kept it very local in a long career in radio. Cheers, Paxse 14:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.