Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Jr. What's On Next?

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, no reliable sources to establish notability, probably original research. Davewild (talk) 20:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nick Jr. What's On Next?

Nick Jr. What's On Next? (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Article is sorely lacking context so it's not even entirely clear what the article is about. It's also completely unreferenced so verifying the content is very hard and I'm very skeptical of the overall importance of an article which, apparently, discusses various in-between-shows blurbs on Nick Jr.. Pichpich (talk) 03:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete, don't merge. Think you figured it out. Article is probably impressive work for its author, but it would take a miracle to make this WP:N. Sorry WMA10! Potatoswatter (talk) 03:16, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. I'm not finding any third-party coverage of the bumpers between kids' TV shows. If there is any to be found, I will be amazed. (Also: whoa, that's a lot of plot summary. Shows dedication, if nothing else.) AnturiaethwrTalk 03:22, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Seriously? An article about 'coming up next' bumpers? I can't cite any policy that I could think of beyond WP:OR, because this seems like a very unlikely article subject. Nate • (chatter) 04:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• Weak delete. Actually (in response to Mrschimpf) I believe there are articles on similar promotions, but in this case all we have is what appears to be unsourced memories of this promotion, so there's no way of telling what's accurate here or not. And the second sentence of the lead, "This quit as of the Nick Jr. slogan "Nick Jr. is Where I Play to Learn." ranks as one of the most illiterate sentences I have ever seen on Wikipedia. I'm saying "weak delete" as there's a possibility of someone rescuing this article, but I won't lose sleep if it goes. 23skidoo (talk) 18:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
  
  • Comment Usually the article scope is limited to network imaging and star campaigns, but not basic details like 'you're watching "show" on "network"' or '"show" is next on "network"'. Nate • (chatter) 21:53, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination, oh heavens no. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 22:10, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:46, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per others. There is no reason for this to exist. Non-notable, difficult to verify, not suitable for an encyclopedia. Doctorfluffy (fart in my face) 16:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.