Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Hamilton

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Joyous 23:08, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nick Hamilton

Does being a pro-wrestling referee make one worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia? Nick Hamilton returns 347 hits on google. [1] GRider\^talk 01:01, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)~

• Delete. He's a ref, not one of the entertainers. (Granted, I don't watch the stuff, but it doesn't seem to me that he actually is part of the show.) – Beginning 02:20, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, under the bar of notability for me. Megan1967 05:27, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. A referee is just as much part of the match as the wrestlers themselfs, would you delete football referees just because they dont score goals? plus he is not just a referee, he is the senior offical of SmackDown! and has worked with the top promotions in North America. deleting this would be the same as deleting Earl Hebner, and thats just not right. Paulley 12:59, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, agree with above user. Grue 17:58, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Way above the bar of notability for me. Xezbeth 18:01, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Remember that in pro wrestling, "referees" are performers too. — Gwalla | Talk 23:30, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Agree with Paulley and Gwalla. —RaD Man (talk) 02:25, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, widely seen professional entertainer. Kappa 08:40, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. ComCat 02:16, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - David Gerard 15:07, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, wrestling cruft. JamesBurns 06:26, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.