Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Douglas (journalist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 00:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nick Douglas (journalist)

Nick Douglas (journalist) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable blogger - doesn't meet criteria for WP:BIO. Sources are mostly self-published. RJASE1 ^Talk 05:38, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, derez, whatever: per WP:BIO, NN. It isn't even that he writes a blog, he writes about blogs?? If I was that insignificant I'd shoot myself. RGTraynor 16:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Let's try to be at least a bit civil, shall we? -- Jonel | Speak 04:30, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Yes, please be sensitive to the feelings of these people. RJASE1 ^Talk 04:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Errr ... "sensitive to the feelings" of dead people? You greatly overestimate my connection with the afterlife. RGTraynor 15:03, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Back on topic. Not notable. 11:50, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable. —Ocatecir ^Talk 11:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.