Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Bussey
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete per G7 (put up for deletion by original author). ugen64 18:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Nick Bussey
Non-notable footballer. Has never played in a professional league. Mattythewhite 18:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep- Notable enough. The club he plays for is professional. The sunder king 18:13, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete fails the usual "hasn't played professional" criterion. Move along. The Rambling Man 18:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
-
- Leave my article alone, now. The leagues actually are professional because they are notable The sunder king 18:25, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- See WP:OWN. Nobody owns an article. Mattythewhite 18:25, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Leave my article alone, now. The leagues actually are professional because they are notable The sunder king 18:25, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Erm. Okay, but just stop it. I think it can survive on wikipedia. It has references, and is well written. The sunder king 18:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thats the opinion I used to have in my early days. But I'm sorry, it fails WP:BIO. Mattythewhite 18:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Erm. Okay, but just stop it. I think it can survive on wikipedia. It has references, and is well written. The sunder king 18:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- It does not. He is notable, and I mean it. The sunder king 18:28, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Delete Not notable. Does not meet the requirement of WP:BIO that he should "...have played in a fully professional league...", which is determined by WP:FOOTBALL to be the Premier League, the Championship, League One and Football League Two in England. Nick Bussey does not come anywhere near to meeting this. --Malcolmxl5 18:29, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Speedy close- put up for CSD a7 by me. For stopping you pratts from pratting me around. The sunder king 18:31, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Please be civil, sunder king. --Malcolmxl5 18:40, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
I got rid of it. Are you happy now? Now I need someone other than User:Hal who can teach me the wikipedia policies. The sunder king 18:41, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Why do you think we are doing this to annoy you? I'm just going by Wikipedia guidelines! Dude, keep cool. You need to discuss things. Mattythewhite 18:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
-
- I did think under those lines yes. I also felt annoyed at when they ruined your Requests for adminship, and I still believe you meet the criteria. Wikipedia policies are annoying. The sunder king 18:46, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- They certainly can be, but we have to get on with things the best we can. Mattythewhite 18:47, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- I did think under those lines yes. I also felt annoyed at when they ruined your Requests for adminship, and I still believe you meet the criteria. Wikipedia policies are annoying. The sunder king 18:46, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
