Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NicePop

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 06:14, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] NicePop

Neologism. Pop music that is nice. —Wahoofive (talk) 05:54, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, neologism. Megan1967 06:18, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, although I don't know what neologism is, until I click on the link I just wrote in. Mwah hah. EvilPhoenix
• Delete. No pages link to NicePop. DoubleBlue (Talk) 14:17, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This tastes like original research/neologism to me. Never heard of this "genre", any Google combination of the two words gets "nice" as an adjective in reviews of "pop" songs, plus (as defined in the article) it can apply to any artist in any genre where some people think that the artist is too nice to really belong in the genre. So it's a description, not a genre. Soundguy99 14:37, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. ✏ OvenFresh² 16:24, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism, and "NicePop" sounds like some kind of word in Newspeak Stancel 16:28, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Wow, seems to be part of the epic battle of the Avril Lavigne article. Astonished it survived so long. No evidence it's a recognised genre, even among her fans, or that anyone will ever fix this stub (or that it's fixable). Andrewa 17:09, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.