Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nica (toponym)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:13, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nica (toponym)

Nica (toponym) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and this has already been transwikied to Wiktionary, at wikt:Transwiki:Nica (toponym) (The article's history doesn't show this, as it has been deleted via Prod and remade since then). No point in making this a redirect anywhere, with the parentheses in the name and all. Xyzzyplugh 12:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Nica as described is not a toponym (i.e., a name of a place) but rather a perjorative ethnonym; if kept, it needs to be renamed. Carlossuarez46 23:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 23:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

• Strong delete It's been transwikied already. This is CSD fodder. Coren 00:28, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Coren. YechielMan 00:31, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete since transwiky. Dictionary def. --Dacium 00:54, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Shouldn't even be up here, should be speedy deleted. Jmlk17 05:17, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.