Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nexus Online (M) Sdn Bhd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 14:50, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nexus Online (M) Sdn Bhd

Delete - quite obvious spam for a not particularly notable company. Prod removed without explanation (of course). Wickethewok 07:59, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Deletion Should be flagged for speedy deletion due to aforementioned. It is indeed spam and someone should flag it for speedy deletion in my opinion. --Marsbound2024 08:08, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Is there a speedy delete for spam tag or anything that I should know of? Wickethewok 08:09, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Here are two links that you can look at and tell me if you think it meets the criteria: Deletion Template; Criteria for Speedy Deletion; I think that it is OBVIOUS spam. --Marsbound2024 08:22, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

• By the way, I think there needs to be a 'speedy deletion due to spam' tag... there doesn't seem to be one. --Marsbound2024 08:24, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

• From my understanding, spam is not speedy deletable at the moment, though it has been debated on the CSD Talk page. Wickethewok 08:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as spam for a non-notable company, as per WP:CORP. I don't see how it qualifies for speedy deletion.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  08:25, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:CORP agreed. -- Samir (the scope) धर्म 08:26, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. Zaxem 08:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Guess I am just one of those who would debate in favor for speedy deletion of spam.  ;) --Marsbound2024 08:31, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 08:33, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. DarthVader 10:19, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Joelito (talk) 14:21, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.