Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Gen Gaming

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete.

I'm deleting this now. There's an overwhelming consensus for deletion, and I don't think a single legit keep vote was cast. With all the socks and vandalism, there's no point in continuing. Several legit delete votes were removed (as if there weren't enough anyway), and rather than try to go back and cut and paste them back in, I'm going to close this to save everyone grief before the process becomes any more tainted. -R. fiend 14:40, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Next Gen Gaming

Anyone sent here from the forum in question. Please read: Wikipedia:Guide_to_Articles_for_deletion#Sockpuppets_are_bad and our policies at WP:NOT, WP:VAIN, WP:WEB. This is primarily a discussion and votes without comments based in policy especially by new users who don't know our policies will be discounted. - Mgm|(talk) 13:13, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

List of non-notable forum participants. Maclaine 03:11, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

  • dont be mad because you didnt get on —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.241.189 (talk • contribs)
  • there are much stupider articles, like c4 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.241.189 (talk • contribs)
  • Delete - We've been over this over and over again. LUE, ZSB, and Legends boards have been deleted; this should be no exception. Hbdragon88 03:09, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Don't delete it. The article is useful and informative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.191.170.136 (talk • contribs)
  • Delete this article, it is pointless and has no academic merit. Also the person who made it is a douchebag —Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.11.133.11 (talk • contribs)
  • Keep - I put a lot of work into this, and its just being abused by vandals --JMRboosties 03:16, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep it. This has no bad effects on wikipedia whatsoever, and is actually fun. I say Keep. —Preceding unsigned comment added by R3xus (talk • contribs)
  • Yes, it has. You guys are using our bandwidth. Get your own webspace. Wikipedia is NOT a webhost. - Mgm|(talk) 13:08, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Also, i am planning to turn this in to its own wiki, paying for it and etc —Preceding unsigned comment added by JMRboosties (talk • contribs)
  • Then it's not needed here. Delete forum trivia. (BTW, we can tell when people are voting more than once). Gazpacho 03:28, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. It is certainly not hurting anything, and is most definately not offensive.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.36.98.51 (talk • contribs)
  • Speedy Delete, and the sooner the better. wikipediatrix 05:28, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Biographies of web forum participants should appear on that web forum (if anywhere) -- not in an encyclopedia such as Wikipedia. --Metropolitan90 06:51, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. Get a Geocities page, guys. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 07:10, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --Swamp Ig 08:50, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - to make sure consensus is clear. JesseW, the juggling janitor 09:23, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. The article is only useful and informative to members of this group. To be encyclopedic it has to have broader appeal. Save the content, move to Geocities. And best wishes with your club. Durova 09:34, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per all of the above. Dottore So 13:00, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete vanity of forum users. - Mgm|(talk) 13:09, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Sorry, guys, but this just doesn't fit in with what Wikipedia is about. Good luck if you set your own wiki up, though. — Haeleth Talk 14:23, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.