Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New World Calendar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 14:41, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New World Calendar

• Also nominating The principles of creating of the New Global calendar, which is essentially the same text as New World Calendar

These two articles are unsourced, unreadable essays on why the poster would like to do away with our current calendar and make a new one. This is obviously original research. Given the way that the essays are in paragraph format, they look like essays made up in school one day. They are not written in a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. New World Calendar has text up at the top that makes it look almost like a test page. Neither page has been modified since being created by their original user. BigDT 05:25, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete unsourced, unreadable and due to be, as Byron put it, "unknelled, uncoffin'd and unknown". Tyrenius 05:44, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both as original research candidates.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  07:26, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per excellently argued nomination. Vizjim 10:24, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per above, unintelligible OR; anything notable could go at calendar reform. Smerdis of Tlön 15:03, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.