Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Tribal Revolution

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - keeping this article in limbo for a merge is only viable if there is anything to merge. PresN (despite arguing for merge) asserts that there is nothing to merge, Mangojuice argues that merging is unnecessary on this basis, and no-one is really taking issue with that (despite this AfD hanging around a very long time). Anyone can create a redirect if they want. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 11:57, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New Tribal Revolution

Neologism, recently invented in one guy's book. Cheese Sandwich 16:46, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

• Weak delete as original research. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 16:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I don't follow--where's the original research? Jason Godesky 05:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• "New Tribal Revolution" is the term used by Daniel Quinn, as opposed to "New tribalists" or "Neo-Tribalism." This is also the article which deals most fully with Quinn's own idea of the New Tribal Revolution. Of the three articles, this seems like the strongest. Jason Godesky 17:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to My Ishmael New tribalists and Neo-Tribalism, or Keep. Not OR, as the author of the article is presumably not Mr. Quinn. -- nae'blis _(talk)
  • This is a topic Quinn discusses in several works, so merging to My Ishmael hardly seems appropriate, since it would also be under Beyond Civilization. That said, a merge with New tribalists and Neo-Tribalism, as mentioned above, might make sense. Jason Godesky 05:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 19:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Ian Manka Talk to me! 18:05, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

• Merge with New tribalists and Neo-Tribalism, as per above, nothing here that isn't covered there, and it's a term that this guy made up in one of his books. "New Tribal Revolution" gets 2.4k ghits, some, even on the first page, about some myspace band. --PresN 18:52, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as this is already mentioned in both New tribalists and Neo-Tribalism. Mangojuice^talk 17:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.