Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Page

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 00:36, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] New Page

This looks like it was copied from somewhere. No potential to become encyclopedic, original research. Paul August ☎ 03:34, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Xezbeth 06:04, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. A merge with an appropriately titled article would be ok policy-wise, but the article has a lot of POV and inaccuracies. Gazpacho 09:02, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• I think it's an essay, couldn't find source. Merge useful info in either Keynes or Reagan articles and delete. Mgm|^(talk) 09:10, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
• With "Get a Print-Friendly Version" as the first line, this HAS to be copied from somewhere. Delete as a copyvio. RickK 22:23, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, original research. Megan1967 01:43, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete for reasons given by RickK. 23skidoo 20:35, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, definitely sounds like copyvio. At the very least, it's original research. --Deathphoenix 03:28, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Carrp 00:04, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.