Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Destiny Church

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-26 13:47Z

[edit] New Destiny Church

New Destiny Church (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Contested prod, prod read "Unverifiable, fails WP:V (no Google hits for "New Destiny Church" plus Proost, 3 weak hits (own website plus two uninformative ones) for "destiny church" plus proost) If it is notable but has another name, then please create an article with the correct name." There are a few "new destiny churches"[1], but they seem unrelated (and pretty unremarkable as well). New destiny chruch plus proost gives nothing[2]. None of the three links given in the article seems to work (one "not found", one "under construction", and one "domainname not used". Fram 06:12, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. Unverifiable. (Also, just a comment: the creator of the article is Newdestinychurch). Sancho McCann 06:56, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. and prod reasoning. Unverifiable. Delta Tango • Talk 07:10, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete fails WP:V. feydey 08:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:COI, WP:V failure, and above all, religioncruft. Danny Lilithborne 10:09, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. MER-C 11:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:CHURCH. Lacks independent sources to show notability. One would think a genuine Apostle would get some newspaper coverage. Edison 15:38, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per reasons stated above--SUIT 23:14, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom as verifiability violation; see WP:V. Bigtop 23:39, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.