Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Byzantine Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:29, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] New Byzantine Party

tagged as a speedy, but not nonsense -Doc (?) 00:17, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Hoax, no such party (political? NGO?), zero Google for "New Byzantine Party". Perhaps if we had more information I'd reconsider.--inks^T 00:20, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I had tagged it because zero google = party of one, i.e. hoax. Check the editor's posts- all vandalism and hoaxes going back months. IP blocking is in order JJay 00:37, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

hoax is not a speedy deletion criteria (pl read WP:CSD) - patent nonsense should not need google to identify. Delete this - but it is not a speedy. --Doc (?) 01:12, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

OK, I read it. Changed to delete. What about the other article from the same user that i just tagged? JJay 01:26, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, another nonsense article. --Hoovernj 01:14, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete junk --Rogerd 04:56, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete with extreme prejudice. Pure japery. - Sensor 16:23, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete If it is a party, its a nn. one.--Gaff 05:58, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete ridiculous! Ganymead 14:42, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as a hoax, no Google listings and Byzantium did not have a theocracy. Jtmichcock 01:15, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.