Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Bullet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 01:01, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New Bullet

Mangled nomination, listing now. No vote. DES (talk) 04:31, 2 February 2006 (UTC)}

  • I mangled the nomination, sorry, and I am withdrawing it. I suggested to the submitter to merge it to 6.8 mm Remington SPC. This is a clear Merge and delete case. Thank you. --Perfecto 05:14, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
  • The new bullet article is a very good article i vote no it should be kept —Preceding unsigned comment added by New Guy The 17th (talk • contribs) 01:04, 2 February 2006
    • User has 10 edits under this ID at this time, but says he has many annon edits on his user page. DES (talk) 18:43, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I'd vote merge if there was anything here worth keeping, but it's just a lot of unsorced original research and POV analysis. It reads like an article from a gun mag, and there really isn't anything that could be adapted to an encyclopedia that we don't already have. It's got everything wrong with it from predictions about the future to unsourced assertions to blatant POV. Heck, it's even signed. We're better off to just delete this. Night Gyr 10:22, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, this belongs in a gun magazine, not in Wikipedia. JIP | Talk 15:23, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as above, merge unnecessary. Now that it's listed, we may as well express some consensus so this can get done. Ikkyu2 17:15, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete POV essay, possible copyvio? It reads like a magazine article. Furthermore, New Bullet is far too generic a title. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 21:30, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as original research and POV. Night Gyr neatly eliminated every possible reason to merge any of this. --Lockley 23:13, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Save This is very much so different than the 6.8 mm Rem. article --New Guy The 17th 02:12, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per Night Gyr. Rory096 22:15, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.