Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Network Manifold Associates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete all John Vandenberg (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Network Manifold Associates

Network Manifold Associates (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)
ZSENTRY (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Zmail (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Non-notable company and products; all articles created by company founder and CEO. Can't find any reliable sources for either the company or products. I have access to the acm.org paper cited for ZSENTRY and it has only a trivial mention of Zmail. Jfire (talk) 08:48, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

All three articles were, and as such clearly identified, created by this editor. Not mentioned in the comment above, but a positive point, the articles do not read like an advertisement. The articles are recent and I was hoping that other editors would add more material, rather than continue to do so myself. Given the request in my talk page by Jfire, I'll add more reference material for notability. Edgerck (talk) 19:48, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete for failure of WP:CORP. I agree with Edgerck that the style is consistent with Wikipedia, but the notability criteria have not been met. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 15:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete ZSENTRY and Zmail. Also delete Network Manifold Associates unless disinterested references are found for that article's assertions, which may make a case under the business notability guidelines. The article's claims of adoption by the Swedish government may make a sufficient case for notability, in which case edited versions of the articles on the two products could be merged. As a tech business, it doesn't get the benefit of a doubt: references need to be provided first. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:50, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.