This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete.Woohookitty 00:56, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
Article is a dicdef of a neologism; I deleted creator's name and contact info, but the article is still unacceptable for inclusion. jglc | t | c 6 July 2005 19:59 (UTC)
Delete - neologism --Gunmetal 6 July 2005 21:06 (UTC)
In my book that is a CSD #1 speedy as little or no content/context. Otherwise delete as neologistic dicdef. - Mgm|(talk) July 7, 2005 08:17 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.