Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netcentric
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Merged to net-centric --Stephen 23:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Netcentric
non notable neologism RogueNinjatalk 18:52, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and WP:NEO. I don't see enough notability anywhere, likely better suited to Urban Dictionary Travellingcari (talk) 19:07, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment - seems to be used in a lot of scholarly places to be a neologism scholar.google & books.google. Please, expand on your reasoning. Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 07:19, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SorryGuy Talk 01:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC)- Delete - Nonnotable neologism. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 02:31, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Keep, and merge with net-centric. Well defined, widely covered in reliable sources. Needs refs, fine otherwise. The subconcept network-centric warfare is well defined and well documented. Mostlyharmless (talk) 05:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - As I stated above, plenty of sources available describing and using the term. Nom has not addressed my concerns, so isn't justifying a delete. Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 05:19, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Merge netcentric with net-centric Generally well defined, especially in American Government sector work. Federal News Radio link, provided as support. [1] AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 15:05, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Merge as per Mostlyharmless. —Qit el-Remel (talk) 17:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Merge MBisanz talk 01:47, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.