Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NetLimiter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn following WP:HEY. Meets speedy keep criteria. Non-admin closure. --Dhartung | Talk 04:53, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] NetLimiter

NetLimiter (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Notability not asserted - fails WP:N, no references - fails WP:RS and WP:V ukexpat (talk) 00:46, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Speedy Keep. I am genuinely shocked and appalled. Apart from having 945,000 ghits, this software is extremely popular. Cel Talk to me 01:16, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Comment: After looking at the article, I can see where someone might mistake it's notability. The article is crap. While the subject is certainly notable, the article itself needs some serious work; I'll get on that now. Cel Talk to me 01:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Comment: I've added 4 references, rewrote parts of the article, and am currently expanding on the existing material. More refs should follow shortly, but what is already here should be sufficient to establish WP:N and WP:V. Cel Talk to me 02:42, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


As for notability - NetLimiter is a well-recognized software. Something like Windows. I assumed that if Windows is notable, then NetLimiter should also be.

As for Reliable Sources - what source is reliable, when program's official site isn't? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomek.poznan (talk • contribs) 01:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Speedy Keep updated article - clear notability now asserted -Halo (talk) 03:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Nomination Withdrawn. Works for me - nice work on the upgrades! – ukexpat (talk) 04:28, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.