Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neototalitarism

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 05:07, May 10, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Neototalitarism

Neologism. The only google web hit for +Neototalitarism +Rendón (or Rendon) is a Wikipedia mirror. About 65 web hits for this term, 55 for Neototalitarian and 24 for Neototalitarianism; they don't seem to show a common meaning for the terms, just a bunch of people recreating the neologism. Redirecting to totalitarianism would suggest a troublesome precedent that obscure neologisms should just redirect to a related word, which would validate those neologisms before demonstration they even had commonly accepted meanings. Samaritan 18:48, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Agree with Samaritan. Meelar (talk) 19:33, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Agree with Samaritan and Meelar. Quale 19:46, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Agree. If other (notable) authors could be cited using the term for this or other purposes, we might have a useful article. But this as it stands is not encyclopedic in any way. Andrewa 20:49, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete since no credible third party references were found. Zzyzx11 | Talk 20:53, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete agree with Samaritan, Meelar, and Quale. —Wahoofive (talk) 21:14, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, neologism. Megan1967 01:51, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Probably anti-Chavista propaganda. —Seselwa 22:00, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.