Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neopia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 00:04, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Neopia
does not belong in encyclopedia Pilotbob 02:06, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Could you explain why you don't believe it belongs in the encyclopedia? Clearly you feel that way, as you're nominating it for deletion. But could you cite a specific policy or guideline? I've done a quick Google Books search and found some references, I'll add them. The article is certainly in need of help, it's too long and in an in-universe format. But I don't think it warrants deletion. faithless (speak) 03:47, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep and Close - An important article that pertains to Neopets. Doesn't warrant deletion. Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 04:37, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Too much information to merge into Neopets and couldn't be put anywhere else. Red Fiona 14:07, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I don't see how most of this information can be cited with reliable sources and the article is basically fancruft. This article is inherently unencyclopedic. It has been around for over 1.5 years and if it was going to improve it would have happened by now. Pilotbob 16:50, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep -- passes Notability, with multiple external cites. May need cleanup, but that's not a valid reason for deletion.--SarekOfVulcan 17:38, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep often mentioned as an example. See also [1],[2],[3],[4]. JJL 23:08, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.