Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nellie stoe johnson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by Pedro (talk · contribs) as G12. Non-admin closure. Blair - Speak to me 23:07, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nellie stoe johnson

Nellie stoe johnson (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable cruft Ziggy Sawdust 20:13, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

• I'm confused. Did you revert your own edit to mark the page for deletion? -- Swerdnaneb 20:21, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
• Ambivalent AfD is not for cleanup. This page needs an overhaul. It might be easier to delete it and start over. The subject easily meets the notability requirements. obit school NPR. -- Swerdnaneb 20:24, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Clearly notable, given the references. Tag for hella cleanup. Argument for deletion seems to be WP:CRUFTCRUFT. —Quasirandom (talk) 20:35, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy G12? I would bet my bottom dollar that this is a copyvio from the original author's book. I have tagged a similar page over here. The only reason I haven't tagged this one is that there doesn't appear to be a "sample page" that I can point to. And I'm not spending the money to buy the book from the press. There are some big issues with WP:COI here. Anyone else? -- Swerdnaneb 20:50, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Found it! Tagged. -- Swerdnaneb 20:52, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.