Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neko-ryu
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 08:51, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Neko-ryu
Fails WP:N. No independent sources cited for this martial art, and expert review request to Wikipedia:WikiProject Martial arts did not turn up any. -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 08:45, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletions. —Peter Rehse 08:53, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- delete as not notable, no externals to even get started on, google gives 12 matches. --Nate1481( t/c) 08:58, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment[1]try it without the hyphen. I doubt it's enough, but what exactly is the standard for notability of a martial art?Horrorshowj 21:18, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Substantial coverage in reliable sources, just as for everything else. Read WP:NOTE, it tells you all you need to know. --Eyrian 21:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'm familiar with notability standards. However, a subject can pass by meeting specific without meeting general. Since I've never seen a Martial Art up for Afd, I'm asking if there is a specific standard that applies. Horrorshowj 21:41, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Substantial coverage in reliable sources, just as for everything else. Read WP:NOTE, it tells you all you need to know. --Eyrian 21:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, no reliable sources. --Eyrian 16:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, as this sounds distinctively like something that comes from a single episode of Ranma 1/2. A side note, a tiger is not appropriate if you are using the Japanese word neko. But that's semantics. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 21:47, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Having met him in person on the mat, I can attest to the fact that the Ernie Cates and his ryu are the real deal, but that doesn't change the fact that there are basically no sources to cite. —Mrand T-C 01:45, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed, thanks for the note - I stand corrected then. 'Tis a shame, really, that there are no sources. It coulda been a contendah. =^_^= --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 06:10, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per all deletes above. Not notable. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:58, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
