Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Mahapatra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 01:10, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Neil Mahapatra

This afd nomination was incomplete. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:48, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

I nominated for these reasons - 1. The subject is not notable. Presidency of a student club, young employee of a bank seems to be his only claims to fame. 2. The article appears to have been created to allow (or at least has served the purpose of) the publication of potentially libellous claims about subject, perhaps by a rival at work (the person who attempted to introduce said claims was called "Morganstanman" and he claims to work at same place as subject. 3. Much of information (which I deleted) which made up the article consisted of total speculation about the subject's future role in British politics despite no indication that he is currently or has ever been involved in politics other than as President of a student debating society.

--82.35.78.232 17:00, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete The Oxford Union is a notable organisation and Presidents of the Union often go on to become notable individuals in their chosen fields. Mr Mahapatra doesn't appear to be a notable junior investment banker, nor to have achieved anything else beyond graduation that the author feels should be used to assert his notable status. Non-notable biography. -- (aeropagitica)  17:32, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Reads like a vanity page. --circuitloss 17:41, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable biography per (aeropagitica). —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-11 03:00Z
• Delete as per norm. --ΜιĿːtalk 17:20, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. utcursch | talk 05:14, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.