Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Black

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. --MarkSweep (call me collect) 08:13, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Neil Black

• Speedy delete– No sources, references. Seems original research. Darwiner111 09:43, 4 February 2006 (UTC).
• Keep, individual is clearly notable based on google hits. Unsourced info might need to be trimmed. Or maybe in minute #2 of the article's existence, sources will be added? That's the trouble with slapping an AFD tag on there 1 second after the page is created. Christopher Parham (talk) 09:45, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 17:11, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per Chistopher Parham. Where (talk) 18:14, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Obviously it's not notable to play the oboe or even to be a principal player in an orchestra. However, to be principal oboe in these orchestras means that he is one of the very best oboists in the world. Logophile 01:49, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - notable oboist with music available from Amazon. [1]. Capitalistroadster 01:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.