Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Negative Reinforcement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 17:56, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Negative Reinforcement

PROD tag removed without comment by an anon. Article is on a nonnotable podcast and seems to be basically advertising for it. Delete. User:Angr 06:08, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Reads as an advert for the podcast rather than a discussion of its notability. Discussion of controversial topics such as racism and rape is not inherently notable. WP:WEB refers.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  06:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per  (aeropagitica) .--Andeh 06:49, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, ad, fails WP:WEB. --Coredesat 07:16, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete under WP:WEB guidelines. --Arnzy ^{(whats up?)} 13:08, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete and redirect to reinforcement. Teaser style advertising is deliberately obscure and explains nothing, which makes it patent nonsense. Smerdis of Tlön 15:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per failure to meet WP:WEB]. Smerdis of Tlön's redirect suggestion in place of this article is a good one, but I suspect it would need to be monitored against recreation.--Isotope23 18:50, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Just read it. Danny Lilithborne 20:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I admit I am the one responsible for writing the entry on Negative Reinforcement. Yes, I admit that the main reason behind the creation of this page is to create an awareness of the podcast on the Wikipedia regulars. However, I also wrote it as a loyal follower of the Podcast. I truly believe in what he is trying to do. I believe in every word he says. If you are upset over the creation of this page, please put all on the blame on me, not him. Don't create a backlash towards the Podcast itself just because an entry based on the site was created and violated the site's rules and regulations. If you truly think the existence of this entry causes a disturbance in the balance of this website, feel free to do so. I will not stop visiting this site just because of a deletion. I have been the admin of some sites in the past and it is understandable that the rules of a website must be obeyed. My deepest apologies. -P —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pap64 (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.