Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Needles & haystacks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Needles & haystacks

Needles & haystacks (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

A music label which appears to consist entirely of a freewebs site. Article creator Mitche08 has created a number of articles about this label and its subsidiary artists, all of which have been deleted as non-notable. Notability is claimed by placing in the "Street Hot 100" charts, although I can find no evidence this chart even exists (0 relevent ghits apart from wp articles by this author). FiggyBee (talk) 02:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Strong Delete as non-notable record label, failing WP:CORP. I'm quite familiar with the Billboard charts, and I can guarantee that no "Street Hot 100" chart exists. Plus, I doubt a notable label would be using freewebs. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 02:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete pending reliable sources that back notability claims. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:30, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - non-notable label per [1] and [2]. Fails WP:ORG, no second or third party sources available. Wisdom89 (T / C) 02:37, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete-I have also engine searched the "Street Hot 100", non-existant, and I found no third party sources for the corporation, which (like a user said above), fails WP:CORP.TrUCo-X 03:19, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails all the relevant tests, non-notable and unsourced. - Dravecky (talk) 20:05, 30 March 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.