Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neagra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep: the objection (being redlink-only DAB page) has been removed. Mukadderat 17:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Neagra

Neagra (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Disambiguation page that contins only red links. Your Grace Lord Sir Dreamy of Buckland ^tm 20:12, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

• Close and list over at WP:AFD. That's not miscellany. --UsaSatsui 22:57, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
• Note, moved from WP:MFD to WP:AFD. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:53, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:53, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

• I am inclined to vote keep, since all of the redlinked articles it dabs for are, in themselves, notable and thus all one would have to do to make this disambiguation page keepable is to stub the articles for the towns in question. It seems pointless to delete this DAB page when it becomes instantly keepable with 5 minutes of work... --Jayron32|talk|contribs 16:07, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per Jayron32--Victor falk 16:47, 9 October 2007 (UTC) per walking the walk, not talking the talk.--Victor falk 17:13, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Thank you for doing so Victor. This seems to be easily keepable now, as the only objection has been fixed. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 17:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - stubs have been completed so this is definitely worth keeping. Well done Victor! --BelovedFreak 17:23, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.