Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ncn High Pavement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:04, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ncn High Pavement

Ncn High Pavement (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

- Jack (talk) 11:57, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 18:13, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Keep but Stubify - the "students" section is clear nonsense that would be speediable, but assuming the school itself actually exists, then it probably merits an article (since the failure of WP:SCHOOL there's no policy on inclusion of schools, but most schools have their own articles at present). Reduce to stub, however, until accurate and sourced information can be provided. Walton monarchist89 19:27, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
• delete student section is nonsense, the rest seems to refer to a section of a school that in itself is hardly notable. Arnoutf 19:58, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Most of this article is either libelous or nonsense. If it is desirable to have an article about this school at all, it would be better to have this deleted from the edit history and have someone start over from scratch. --Metropolitan90 22:01, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete 3/4 of this is simple nonsense, besides that,its a non-notable group in a non-notable school. SkierRMH, 02:30, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Inadequately referenced. And drivel. WMMartin 14:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.