Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nazmi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:47, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nazmi

Nazmi (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Augh... where to start? All 150 kB of this article were pasted in at once by a user who has made no contributions outside this article, and the article has barely changed since then - not because it's perfect, though, but because it's impossible to know where to start. The article starts out like a biography of Syed Aley Rasool Hasnain Miyan Nazmi (now that's a mouthful), but goes off on a series of mini-biographies on various other persons and anecdotes, then - around halfway through - launches into a treatise on Islam.

There isn't a single reference, and almost no wikilinks, in the entire thing. Almost none of the names show up on Google. If this isn't patent nonsense, it's unverifiable and unmaintainable. Tktech put a tag on the talk page noting that he was working on it, but that was over a month ago and nothing has changed since. Delete without prejudice to a well-written, well-referenced article if one can be created. Zetawoof(ΞΆ) 11:12, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete totally unsourced and possibly copyvio. Kavadi carrier 11:37, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Portions found here and here - (parts) seem to be have been directly copied from external sources. --Ouro 13:12, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete Copyright violation. Storm05 18:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete I would also think this is copyright violation. I'm no expert on India or Islam, but the article contains some many seemingly disconnected ideas that it would be extremely hard to fix. There are also no sources, and few can be found. Maybe someone could create a new article from scratch.
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. --  Doctor Bruno  16:00, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.