Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naughty boys of finchley

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 15:35, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Naughty boys of finchley

does not look like it deserves an entry 84.144.56.182 16:06, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Joke between friends, and written in a familiar person at that. Mike H 17:14, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: vanity article. -- Bobdoe (Talk) 17:15, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: vanity as usual andy 17:18, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity - Mailer Diablo 18:30, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• "Hello, you've reached the Naughty Boy of Finchley, but I can't get to the phone right now because I'm busy getting my article deleted." (group vanity) Tygar 23:54, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • That's hot. Mike H 00:59, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, bloke vanity. Wyss 00:58, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and clean up. 477 Google hits in quotes. They even have their own site and all! --Ryan! | Talk 01:01, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete 477 google hits isn't enough to make them even remotely close to notable. DaveTheRed 03:44, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Not to mention that of those 477, only 84 of them are unique DaveTheRed 03:47, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Danny 03:46, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• And what are they trying to prove with "and mention that you've seen this entry on Wikipedia!!" Delete these kiddies' little fantasy. -- Riffsyphon1024 03:49, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 05:27, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Yes I'm a Wikipedia newbie, although have recently started using WikiMedia in our business, please forgive me if my entry here isn't 100% as it should be. Granted there are only 12 members of the Naughty Boys of Finchley Association although we do have grand ideas of expanding. If others think it's not worthy of an entry then so be it, we'll rely on our website. There a are number of us who are web users and would have contributed to a growing Wikipedia entry...
• Delete No reason to tie up Wikipdeia with a vanity page.

--Naughtynick 11:39, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.