Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nature in ramayana

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deleted. Dmcdevit·t 06:42, July 27, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nature in ramayana

I don't know what this is about, but I know it's not encyclopedic and likely a copyvio as it largely contains a translation of copyrighted material. Delete. Nature in Ramayana is the correct place should it be kept. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:08, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. This entry serves little purpose and, as the above poster noted, appears a copywrite violation of some variety. -Soltak 21:57, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete copyvio. JamesBurns 04:46, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with Ramayana. I have no idea where the text cited might come from, but there are many public domain translations of the Ramayana, so I wouldn't assume copyvio. Xoloz 15:49, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
  • For everyone's information, the Ramayana is an ancient sanskrit epic, the source of much of Hindu tradition. Xoloz 15:51, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki the slokas (if they are non-copyvio original). The remainder of the article is pointless. Bambaiah 09:32, July 18, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.