Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural Penis Enlargement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect. W.marsh 00:49, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Natural Penis Enlargement

This article is a very small joke. Ruby 19:33, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect to Penis enlargement. Not so much a joke as a pointless, content-light version of an existing (if poorly written and sourced) article. Jelqing already redirects to Penis enlargement. No reason this shouldn't too.--Isotope23 19:39, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per Isotope23. Smerdis of Tlön 19:49, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect - per above --lightdarkness ^(talk) 20:12, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per above. PJM 20:13, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect, what a useless article.... Royboycrashfan 20:29, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Even the phrase itself will generate extra Google hits, I fear, for the sort of people behind this chestnut spam topic. "This article will be updated on a regular basis with as much info on Natural Penis Enlargement as possible"? Sorry, I've already heard more than enough. Daniel Case 20:40, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No need to redirect, IMO Avi 21:40, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect Sometimes redirects avoid articles being re-created, which I is a good thing in this case. Makemi 21:44, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to prevent any regrowth of the article. Carlossuarez46 01:03, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.