Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National super hero day

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - WP:SNOW applies. Stifle (talk) 14:38, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] National super hero day

National super hero day (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable corporate holiday. No references. Prod removed by author. JuJube (talk) 00:06, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. I'm not finding reliable sources (not that I thought I would). This holiday hasn't exactly reached the level of International Talk Like a Pirate Day, if you know what I mean. AnturiaethwrTalk 00:19, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

• Geez, now I wish I'd said "stronger-than-a-locomotive delete" or something like that. ("Speedier-than-a-speeding-bullet delete" doesn't apply here, I think.) AnturiaethwrTalk 04:51, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Make it walk the plank, matey. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:29, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Look, up in the sky -- it's a bird, it's a plane, it's...not notable. Ecoleetage (talk) 01:42, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• YAARRRR!...Um, I mean delete for not being as awesome as national talk like a pirate day. Also for lack of notability, and WP:NOT. Protonk (talk) 01:54, 29 April 2008 (UTC) MAN. Beaten to the punch again. And with a better link, too. Protonk (talk) 02:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Google comes up with nothing. — Wenli ^{(reply here)} 02:33, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete (as all the clever pirate metaphors have been taken). A non-notable holiday, and wikipedia isn't for things that were just madeup. Bfigura ^(talk) 04:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• To the Delete-cave, Batman! (I tried...) Lack of reliable sources indicates lack of notability. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 11:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

• Up, up, and away with this article! That is to say, Delete as even though the more-logical "National Superhero Day" does quite a bit better in the Google search [1] department, there are still no Google News hits so while it's not a hoax it doesn't quite reach the threshold of of notability. - Dravecky (talk) 11:56, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

• There is a claim to notability in the article: This holiday has been recognized by Dartmouth College students and was even celebrated one night at the Kappa Kappa Kappa fraternity at 1 Webster Avenue. That does it for me - Delete Emeraude (talk) 14:15, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

• To infinity and beyond aka a sad delete. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 14:36, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete (without a humorous superhero phrase) per nom. No claim to notability and unsourced. Frank Anchor ^{Talk to me} (R-OH) 15:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

• My Spidey Sense it telling me to say "delete per above" NewYork483 (talk) 15:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Oh yeah, we can delete. BTW, fails WP:N. RC-0722 ^247.5/1 15:44, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per above.--Berig (talk) 17:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as above. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 22:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Per what Wenli said above. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 09:37, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Funny but not notable. Nsk92 (talk) 17:56, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
• Riddle me this: What do you call an article with no sources, and no evidence of being notable? Delete. Pastordavid (talk) 18:25, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:N and WP:RS. I can't think of a wiity superhero phrase... ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 19:14, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 20:53, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Google shows no reliable sources, therefore, non-notable.--RyRy5 (talk ♠ wikify) 23:46, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.