Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Monument (Ireland)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] National Monument (Ireland)

National Monument (Ireland) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Incomplete nomination by anonymous IP. Article was also de-prodded without discussion. Procedural nomination only, no vote from me. Arkyan 16:50, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep and clean up. Possibly add a list of monuments that are classified as National Monuments by the "state" - Ozzykhan 18:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep referenced and notable, but could do with a list of such monuments as suggested by Ozzykhan. --Canley 10:27, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletions. -- Canley 11:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I tidied this up a few days ago, but as it is it doesn't say very much. The Ministry web-site has an undated note saying that the Record of Sites and Places has been removed from the web-site because of "errors in the locational information" - which sounds as though they are not sure where the monuments are. Perhaps someone has been moving them? They estimate that it will be back in six months from the undated note, which is not helpful. It might be possible to do a better article then. Delete for now.Raggio 20:45, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KrakatoaKatie 04:27, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per Ozzykhan and Canley ⇒ SWATJester On Belay! 04:43, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, an obviously notable topic despite the agency's computer troubles. Surely there are print sources for monuments designated before the computer era. -- Dhartung | Talk 05:48, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Needs the list and a little cleanup, but easily salvageable and the subject is notable. Realkyhick 06:11, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - while I like the idea of Irish national monuments moving about the countryside (and noting today's date!) I don't really think the government has lost any of them. Clearly notable; needs a fix-up. -- BPMullins | Talk 14:52, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Perfectly legitimate topic, no discernible reason for deletion. Cloachland 14:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Needs cleanup. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 18:53, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Worthy of getting its own article. Captain panda In vino veritas 21:02, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep It's a good entry but it should be expand.--Sa.vakilian(t-c) 11:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.