Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National BackUp Day
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:01, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] National BackUp Day
Article is both a personal essay and a soapbox for the author's page www.nationalbackupday.com Gihanuk (talk) 15:24, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable, no independent nontrivial reliable coverage at all. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 15:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Same reason as all above. Not "article" enough.
- O—— The Unknown Hitchhiker 15:40, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete spammy TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 16:10, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Vanispamcruftisement, I believe. Maxamegalon2000 16:16, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete this is a a personal essay by a single purpose account that advertises the website with a bit of WP:COI and article ownership thrown in (use of I, the inclusion of email at the end) Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 16:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, including all the backups (hah). Ten ghits for what's supposed to be an online phenomenon. Two of them are Wikipedia, four (maybe five?) are social news sites, and the rest are unrelated. Also, the article content is totally inappropriate for an article. Zetawoof(ζ) 01:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete WP:CSD#G11, blatant advertisement. So tagged. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:47, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
