Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Action

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 13:04, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] National Action

Article was nominated for speedy deletion per A7, non-notability, but doesn't qualify: the notability of the subject has been asserted. I'm moving this to AfD instead. No opinion, but inclined to keep. Aecis ^{Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984.} 12:05, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions and in the list of politics-related deletions. -- Aecis ^{Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984.} 12:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Notable as an extremist politcal party and also for its involvement in violence. There are too many moves to delete extremist movements from Wikipedia these days. They may not win elections but are notable for their critique of modern democracies and should generally be kept in my opinion. Keresaspa 13:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep Notable as a well-known neo-Nazi grouplet. Books have been written about them (I Was A Teenage Fascist, for example), veritable reams of newsprint, mentions in parliament. Drett 15:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
  • If you cite the books in the article you won't end up at AFD once again months from now. Uncle G 18:12, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. It's a bad idea to get rid of such parties' articles. They should be kept and expanded with citations of their histories of violence and anti-liberty rhetoric. Sunshine hurts. But this article should be properly cited and then cloesly monitored to prevent pro-NA POV-pushing and removal of criticism. — coelacan talk — 17:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or delete all other parties that never have been in a parliament Alf photoman 19:07, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Needs improving with additional sources. I will attempt to wikif. But I don't have access to political reference material.Garrie 00:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and source. A Google News Archive search for "National Action" Saleam comes up with six references [1]. Capitalistroadster 01:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep with better sourcing. SkierRMH,02:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

• Keep if it was a registered political party. --Canley 03:14, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Certainly a notable political party/action group. --Roisterer 00:09, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, more notorious than notable, but these guys were pretty well known for a bunch of far-right fruitcakes. Lankiveil 05:18, 16 December 2006 (UTC).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.