Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan roberts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:13, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nathan roberts

Nathan roberts (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Apparently contested speedy. No assertion of notability; no sources to be found about this individual. Does not meet even the most basic criteria of in-development WP:PROF guideline. Further, article appears to be a Conflict of Interest, written by the subject "Nathan M. Roberts" -- Leflyman^Talk 16:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete unless the author - or someone - can provide evidence that he wrote a major textbook on otters, or something similar - iridescenti (talk to me!) 20:42, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 21:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Graduate student at Cornell. Not notable yet. —David Eppstein 01:13, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Nice work! --The very model of a minor general 17:05, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per Leftyman and David Eppstein. Maxamegalon2000 05:06, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
• delete per Eppstein. Let's wait until we hear something about his work. --The very model of a minor general 17:05, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.