Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan bond

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Philippe 19:50, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nathan bond

Nathan bond (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Potentially non-notable actor (Google search only turns up namesakes. No establishment of major appearances or proof of notable acting career. No references. Booglamay (talk) 16:54, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Comment: references/external links have been added since the AfD notice was put in place. However, the link to the IMDB is to a Thomas Law, not Nathan Bond. I'm confused Comparing the two links, IMO the two people are different (most notably birthdates and credits do not match). Booglamay (talk) 17:02, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete: Non-notable actor—we'd need to see evidence of some significant roles in order to keep this. Has the feel of a vanity page as it stands... The original editor also edited the Thomas Law article—I suspect he added the new links in error. – Stuart. (Sjb90 | talk) 17:06, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete: The person who created the article has also vandalised other articles (here and here, for example), so it would seem that this isn't a serious attempt at creating a new article for Wikipedia. Also, the IMDb link added appeared to me to be an attempt to make the article outwardly appear to be about a notable actor (when, in fact, it was a link to somebody else). The Baroness of Morden (talk) 18:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 19:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. NN Dreamspy (talk) 20:21, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.