Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear consensus with no over-riding policy reasons to delete. TerriersFan 13:32, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nate

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:WEB Hu12 09:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletions. -- PC78 10:14, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, 20 million users suggests some degree of notability. PC78 10:14, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. The reference backing up that claim looks to be (on the Altavista Babelfish translation of the page) an ICT news cite that just recycles media releases. Dbromage [Talk] 10:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
  • It's one of the major internet portals in South Korea, and there are independant sources to verify its popularity ([1], [2]). There is sufficient evidence to refute the nominator's claim that it fails notability guidelines. PC78 15:56, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, being a significant corporation, and what's with all the extra AfDs there on the side that don't have anything to do with this one? --UsaSatsui 03:47, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
  • It appears that AFD box uses some kind of wildcard search, and as such, dredges up anything with "Nate" in the title. --Agamemnon2 10:43, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep 20 MILLION - Fosnez 15:24, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
    • Pretty poor argument for notability. 20 million isn't even notable enough to have an article. (and WP:BIG)--UsaSatsui 16:28, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, appears to be a popular web portal with a notable business behind it. Italiavivi 19:58, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.