Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natch (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Sceptre ^(Talk) 20:40, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Natch

This is just a dictionary definition, and the word "natch" already has a Wiktionary entry. The article previously came up on Articles for deletion and was speedily deleted, although apparently not with the same content. Nevertheless, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and this article should be deleted. --Metropolitan90 01:31, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 03:02, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- Nick Douglas 07:45, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, as it's already in Wiktionary, natch. — JIP | Talk 14:55, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Izehar 18:44, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dustimagic 19:59, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete it is in Wiktionary Volvolus 22:38, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.